Ivan95

Yeah, it just means resolution very much close to 1920x1080 according to the aspect ratio There are common ones as well, and they are: 1:1: 1920x1920 9:16: 1080x1920 16:9: 1920x1080 4:3: 1920x1152 5:4: 1920x1536 and that's all You can do the same to 2160p, 1440p, 720p, 480p, 360p and 144p

First Building: Music blocks taken in account: Too many note blocks with the same instruments (in the link, search for instruments for more info) (might not be present in minecraft classic versions or in Classicube but still) but still okay-ish 8/10s Okay, you got some blocks you'd need for survival (just counting in minecraft release 1.0): that's great, so 9/10 bangers And for some reason, tables not there in any minecraft versions, probably a mod but still: 8.5/10s Overall: 9.2/10 Second Building: You got yourself a computer in this one (and also a console probably kinda block): If it plays YouTube, then 9/10, otherwise (probably a decoration in this case) 7.6/10s Is that a chocolate bar in the very left side middle?: it is a mod, so 8.2/10s yet another case of second review text in the first building: 9/10 bangers why you need books in minecraft? Especially in the classic versions. Why? If it is purely single-player, then you wouldn't read it anyway, 7.4/10s Overall: 6.9/10 (no, really, this is the score)

I have posted before, but hear me out After many days of my original post in this forum topic, I searched for more candidates of select platforms to be supported on Classicube: There is one possible one, and just like with J2ME one, I also searched in the same place, but this time I also went to Wikipedia for more info And it is Amiga CD32 I mean, the Wikipedia page for it mentions it is on m68k which is the same thing as the Macintosh's the very similar 68k processor they are the same processor, or rather a microprocessor, so they run at the same speed, so meaning that it could work with a good enough community But its internal workings could be different but with a dedicated community, it could be possible Unlike the J2ME, it is not very micro or is trying to reduce electricity bill prices, I mean it is kinda a computer, like most Amiga-enabled computers (AmigaOS-enabled ones) So if it is not really possible, then I did indeed run out of possible platform support ideas.

I mentioned the 4:3 version of 1080p, not the 16:9 version Yes, the resolution does differ on the aspect ratio so here you go 16:9: 1920x1080 4:3: 1920x1152 I first put a 4:3 resolution in paint.net's resize window, then I edited the height from 1280 to 1920, and it gave me the 4:3 result here

But it is usually 16:9, so I was correct about 1920x1080 however it is also on 4:3 in which case it is in fact: 1920x1152

Usually 1080p just means 1920x1080 so you know Also, please do specify the Processor name (Example: Intel Core i5 2400) so everyone knows, you don't have to hide it like if it is a personal information (as it is not a personal information) (View with third-party tool CPU-Z) This is the same thing with the disk (View with Windows Disk Management tool, search with the search tool, or press Win+X and click on Disk Management) And if you do have multiple disks, then please also specify them as well If you do know the RAM Stick manufacturer, then please also specify this (and speed) (View with CPU-Z, but speed is the only thing that you can find in CPU-Z to specify) Also, I'm going to mention another of one of my PCs right now, not just the laptop (Laptop is just for more intense games): Processor: Intel Core i5 2400 RAM: 8GB (650MHz (kinda because it refreshes every time for me)) (Info for speed found in CPU-Z) Video card: Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 Drives: C, F Volumes: LONDISK SSD 240GB ATA Device E Volume: WDC WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 ATA Device Monitor: 21.5" IPS Display HP 22w (Year: 2017) (Anti-Glare Coating found at DisplaySpecifications.com website's database) (VESA Mount: Yes)

For me, it is: Arch Linux and Windows Bro, he just said "computer Operating System" in the title right here! Anyway thanks for your opinion

I don't think you can make custom blocks in classicube work unfortaunly, also same for (custom) animation, all blocks in the block index must match with everyone else's, i would say that same for MCGalaxy unfortanly

I thought Minecraft is basically java?

This is a laptop so most parts that came with this laptop are marked as (internal part) to not confuse users, these parts cannot be removed without removing the case of a laptop, that makes laptops not so user friendly when comes to replacing parts, all parts that came with the laptop also has this mark Dell G3 3590 (laptop) Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz 2592 MHz, Cores: 6, Threads: 12 (internal part) RAM:32,0 GBs (Internal part) Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design (internal part) Second Graphics Card: Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630 (internal part) SSD:SBSSD-128GT-MX902-25S3 (internal part) NVMe:NVMe KBG40ZNS512G NVM (internal part) Monitor:Dell G3 3590 Monitor (internal part)

I would like to see Java 2 Micro Edition Phones play with classicube, now hear me out Emulation General Wiki has a page for J2ME emulators, After looking at the page i thought "If something as almost old as N64 can play classicube then J2ME phones must run this minecraft game then too" According to the website, J2ME is 24 years old and Nintendo 64 is 28 years old So i would like to see the devs try to do J2ME release as J2ME have started shutdown (at 2019) after Nintendo 64 (at 2003) did, so it has to run right? J2ME also supported something called "Mascot Capsule 3D" which adds 3D as a option games like Worms and other games does use this engine, so no consoles or mobile phones must not have any unlicensed games, they must have these games and if they existed before then Classicube must be ported to this platform right? I hope so... (Even tho i don't have any phones that could use J2ME) -Ivan95, a russian